|
Home >
HR News >
HR Headlines >
Tip of the Week
Excerpted from North Dakota Employment Law Letter, written by attorneys at the law firm Vogel, Weir, Hunke & McCormick, Ltd.
January 9, 2004
Americans are in love with "super-size." Big trucks, bigger hamburgers, and
televisions that are now "home theaters" feed a hungry consumer market.
The national obsession with bigger has come at a price: The Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention report that over 60 percent of the American
population now can be classified as overweight.
Strangely, at a time when
Americans are heavier than ever, our perpetual national fixation on our
(ever-increasing) waistlines continues to feed what some call the last
acceptable form of discrimination: weight discrimination. What are your
obligations when dealing with overweight applicants and employees? Are there
legal consequences for refusing to hire an applicant based on weight?
Weighty issue
Fat jokes and popular movies that
ridicule fat characters are a clear testimonial to the fact that obese persons
are the last acceptable targets of discrimination. This apparent discrimination
covers all aspects of life. Various studies have suggested that teachers, health
care professionals, employers, and even parents react less favorably toward
obese persons. Being fat may also affect a person in adoption proceedings, jury
selection, housing, and many other areas of life.
One of the most
prevalent and well-studied areas of discrimination against obese people is
employment. "Obese" is generally defined as a body weight more than 20
percent over the standard height-weight table. "Morbidly" obese is typically
defined as being more than 100 percent above the norm. Based on
his review of 29 research studies, Professor Mark Roehling of Western Michigan
University noted, "Overall, the evidence of consistent, significant
discrimination against overweight employees is sobering." Among other things,
Roehling concluded:
- Obese people were subject to discrimination in all areas of employment
decisions based on weight.
- Obese individuals were often stereotyped as emotionally impaired and
having negative social and personality traits.
- Mildly obese white women earned six percent less than women of average weight. Morbidly obese white women earned 24 percent
less than their counterparts of standard weight.
- Weight seems to matter less for men, both white and black. Mildly obese men actually
earned more than their standard-weight counterparts. Men experienced wage
discrimination only at the highest weight levels.
- One investigation of the social stigma associated with weight in decisions
regarding employee discharge found that participants displayed more negative
attitudes toward obese employees than toward ex-felons or ex-mental patients!
The American public at large seems to be aware of that widespread
discrimination. In a recent poll, 47 percent of the American workers polled
indicated that they believe obese workers suffer discrimination in the
workplace. In the same poll, 32 percent said obese workers are less likely to be
respected and taken seriously in the workplace.
People of size
speak out
Although many obese people have anecdotally reported
silently suffering humiliation in the workplace for years, recently, more
self-designated "people of size" are taking their claims to court.
One of the
most recent claims was a case settled in October between McDonald's in
Connecticut and Joseph Connor, a six-foot one-inch, 420-pound applicant for the
position of cook. Connor had been laid off from his cook position at a mall food
court and had six years of experience as a cook. McDonald's hired him but told
him he couldn't begin work until his pants (54-inch-waist) and shirt (22-inch-neck)
arrived, supposedly in about three days. Connor soon received a call that
his shirt had arrived but not the pants.
Connor waited days, then weeks
and months. He called McDonald's but contended that his calls were never
returned. He went to the store and saw that others hired after him were working.
Finally, he sued McDonald's, contending that it "regarded" him as disabled based
on his morbid obesity. He also contended that his obesity was a disability.
Connor had gained over 130 pounds after being hit in the stomach by a stray
bullet years earlier while weighing 270 pounds. McDonald's denied liability,
contending that he wasn't disabled or regarded as disabled, but it ultimately
settled the claim in a confidential settlement.
Here are some other
examples of claims in recent headlines:
- Susan Wantland also sued McDonald's, this time in Missouri, after it took
two months to get her a uniform. Wantland stood five feet one inch and weighed
320 pounds. After finally going to work, she claimed that she was scheduled for
only two hours of work a day and wasn't allowed to work up front as a cashier,
although she was originally hired as one. Instead, she was required to clean the
restaurant. She claims her obesity is related to a car accident. Her case is
pending.
- David Warner, a 350-pound tree-removal-company employee, sued his
employer. He claims a co-worker told him that his termination came after a
supervisor commented that he was so fat that the supervisor feared he would drop
dead on the job.
The law according to Dr. Phil (and the ADA)
Discrimination based on weight alone is legal in almost all
jurisdictions in the United States. In fact, the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission regulations on the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) specifically
state that "except in rare circumstances, obesity is not considered a disability
impairment." Surprising? Well, maybe not. Remember what Dr. Phil says? Something
like weight is about choices? That's one of the reasons that weight alone isn't
considered a disability under the ADA.
Dr. Phil always talks to his
audience about the fact that for most people, weight isn't solely genetically
determined or based on a medical condition. Most of us can take measures to
control our weight and bring it down within more normal ranges. That means it
isn't an "immutable" condition; rather, it's something we can change, or a
"mutable" condition. When you think of most other discrimination laws, they're
designed to protect immutable conditions, such as race, sex, national origin,
and most disabilities.
When a person's obesity is caused by an
underlying physiological or mental impairment or results in a substantially
limiting impairment, such as hypertension, arthritis, or a heart condition, the
combined effect may qualify as a disability under the ADA. The legal issue that
remains is whether the individual is substantially limited in one or more major
life activities, including activities of central importance to most people's
daily lives.
Under state and federal law, an obese person with a
disability may not be subject to discrimination in employment based on weight
and must be provided reasonable accommodation. If no disability is present,
however, all protection is lost except in the following areas:
- State of Michigan — bans discrimination based on height and weight.
- San Francisco, California — bans discrimination based on weight, except for
police officers, firefighters, and the San Francisco 49ers football team.
- Santa Cruz, California — bans discrimination based on height, weight, or
physical characteristics.
- District of Columbia — outlaws discrimination in employment based on
personal appearance.
Practical pointers
For most employers, dealing with weight issues in the workplace
is unfamiliar territory. Because few cases of weight discrimination in
employment have been raised, there's little to guide you when dealing with obese
applicants and employees. We've put together a few suggestions that might be
useful to you:
Be aware of the issue. The most important thing is
to have your radar up and running for this issue. When dealing with obese
applicants or employees, particularly women, ask yourself whether your company's
employment decisions might subconsciously — or consciously — be affected by
weight. Objectively compare candidates. Make sure discipline is being applied
equitably among all employees. Be fair.
Don't assume obese people
have no rights. Although obesity alone isn't protected under
federal law, remember that a big exception exists if a related physical
disability exists or you regard the person as disabled! Your own bias may
create a claim if you wrongly believe that the person is unable to do the job
because of an impairment related to obesity.
Don't hide obese people
in the backroom. Segregating obese employees and shunting them off to the
backroom, where they will have no customer contact, is a form of discrimination.
Don't make assumptions based on stereotypes about the ability of any employee to
function in a customer contact position. Seriously consider each employee's
positive and negative attributes based on facts, not weight, before making any
decision on job placement.
Copyright © 2004 M. Lee Smith Publishers LLC. This article is an excerpt from NORTH DAKOTA EMPLOYMENT LAW LETTER. NORTH DAKOTA EMPLOYMENT LAW LETTER should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only. Anyone needing specific legal advice should consult an attorney.
Additional Resources
More articles about the ADA

There are articles on every aspect of the ADA in the Subscribers Area of HRhero.com, available at no extra charge if you subscribe to your state's Employment Law Letter. Click here to log in with your user name and password. Then click on "HR Answer Engine."
|
Do You Know the Law in Your State?
Employment law attorneys in your state keep track of new state and federal developments for many of your peers already via a monthly state-specific newsletter. Each issue is only 8 pages and packed with news, analysis, and practical how-to HR solutions. To learn more about your state's Employment Law Letter and the professionals that craft it, click here.
|
:
Return to HR Hero Line e-zine for more tips and articles
: Go to HRhero.com Home Page
|