Forward This Newsletter!

Forward this newsletter along with your comments to friends or colleagues.

Did someone forward HR Hero Line to you?
Subscribe now

 

Audio Conferences

Training without leaving your office

02/20/2007
Train Your Supervisors to Keep Unions at Bay

02/21/2007
Cupid in the Cubicles: The Supervisor's Role in Managing Workplace Romance Issues

02/21/2007
Taking Advantage of HSA Changes: Health Care Act of 2006 and IRS/DOL Rules

02/28/2007
Doing Business in Puerto Rico: 10 Key Differences Employers Need to Know

03/1/2007
Migraines: Legal and Medical Answers for HR

03/7/2007
Tennessee’s Workers’ Comp Benefit Review Process: What Attorneys and Employers Need to Know

03/8/2007
Preparing for the Avian Flu: New Requirements and Legal Guidelines for Employers

More details
or call toll-free (800) 274-6774.

Subscribers Area

Search state & federal law, find articles on issues you're facing today, use sample forms & policies, read in-depth special reports on 24 HR topics, and more.

Log in to Subscribers Area
> Need help logging in? <

Want more info? Take a tour!

IN THIS ISSUE - February 16, 2007

 

From the Editor

Labor Law and Unions 2007 survey results

While the results to HR Hero Line's 2007 Labor Law and Unions survey are similar to those from our March 2005 Unions survey, there are some subtle differences. Here are the highlights of the results from the 2007 survey.

The top 3 methods for preventing union organization have changed somewhat.

Go to www.hrhero.com/survey/survey.cgi?laborlaw2007 to see the survey results.

Wendi Watts
HR Hero Line Editor
WebEditor@HRhero.com 

Feature

Traders, geeks, and managers: Who gets overtime?

Excerpted from Louisiana Employment Law Letter written by attorneys at the law firm Jones Walker

by Jane H. Heidingsfelder and Jennifer L. Anderson

If you've never reviewed the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) website, www.dol.gov, you should. The agency posts information on its website about employers' obligations under the labor and employment laws within its jurisdiction, including one that frequently causes consternation for employers — the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The information provided on the website includes not only the statute and the regulations promulgated by the DOL but also the agency's interpretive guidance and opinion letters explaining its views about FLSA issues, such as whether certain types of employees are exempt or nonexempt.

That information can serve as a valuable resource for you to become familiar with the Act and as a first check on many of the basic FLSA issues that arise in your business.

You should keep in mind, however, that FLSA issues can be complex, and you may need assistance from a labor attorney to properly interpret and apply the Act in a particular situation.

Additionally, as with any governmental agency, the DOL's interpretive guidance and opinion letters aren't binding on courts and, in fact, may differ from decisions rendered by courts.

So it's important to make sure you consult a labor attorney when attempting to interpret or apply the FLSA, particularly in the context of any decision to classify employees or to establish or change pay policies and procedures.

The DOL recently issued a few opinion letters that help clarify its view about whether certain types of employees are exempt or nonexempt, which employers will find useful if they have financial services, information technology, or supervisory employees.

Figuring out exactly what a trader does

In the wake of several multimillion-dollar settlements between investment firms and financial services employees (i.e., traders and brokers) over the issue of whether they're exempt from overtime, the DOL recently weighed in on the topic.

It said that so long as an employee's main duty isn't simply selling investments to the company's clients without any independent analysis, judgment, or advice, "registered representatives" in the securities industry may be exempt from overtime and minimum wage requirements under the FLSA.

Whether an employee fits within the exemption depends on his specific job duties, salary, and method of compensation, however.

Brokers who provide advice to clients after analyzing and interpreting their investment objectives may be exempt if they earn at least $455 per week on a salary basis.

That amount may not be subject to reduction based on the number of hours worked, however, and can be subject only to the permissible deductions for other salaried employees. If the employee's main job merely is to sell stocks to clients without analyzing a client's individual circumstances, he wouldn't be exempt.

That decision is good news for investment firms that are faced with the potential of paying substantial overtime to highly compensated employees previously classified as exempt. It's important, however, to keep in mind that brokers and other financial services employees don't qualify automatically for the exemption based on their job titles alone.

You need to analyze the actual job duties and responsibilities of each employee before determining exempt status, and any questions should be reviewed by a labor attorney to ensure compliance with the FLSA. Wage & Hour Opinion Letter, November 27, 2006.

Not all computer geeks get overtime

Don't be lulled into a false sense of security that all technology personnel are exempt from receiving minimum wage and overtime simply because there's a specific exemption for computer employees.

The DOL recently concluded that certain IT support specialists (or "help desk" employees) aren't exempt from the FLSA's requirements and must be paid minimum wage and overtime.

Help desk employees, in most companies, are the people you call when you're having problems with your computer at work. They mainly are responsible for diagnosing computer problems as requested by other employees.

Their responsibilities are to conduct problem analysis and research, troubleshoot, and resolve computer or network problems in person or by using remote-control software. Help desk employees usually don't need any special degree or education to perform their jobs.

The DOL reasoned that help desk employees who mainly deal with problem-solving and not with more complex matters such as designing and developing software aren't exempt. That opinion again shows that the title of an employee's position alone doesn't determine exempt or nonexempt status.

Of course, the responsibilities of any help desk job may vary from one company to the next, so it's important to review the specific facts of each case when determining an employee's classification.

You need to pay close attention to the employee's specific job responsibilities, particularly those that he actually performs as opposed to those that may be in a written job description or other manual and that he never performs. Wage & Hour Opinion Letter, 2006 DOL-WH LEXIS 56, October 26, 2006.

Out of sight doesn't mean out of mind, or nonexempt, for managers

Does a manager have to be physically present and supervising employees in person to fit within the executive exemption under the FLSA? Not according to the DOL in a recent opinion letter. A manager qualifies for the executive exemption if:

If the manager satisfies that test but doesn't work in the same store or location as the employees she directs, she still can fit within the exemption.

She could be exempt if she's responsible for ensuring that company policies are carried out by employees. That can be done by interviewing, selecting, and training employees; setting and adjusting rates of pay and hours worked; directing the employees' work, even when done remotely; maintaining records; and disciplining employees.

If your manager meets all the other requirements of the executive exemption and doesn't work regularly with the employees she supervises, she still can be exempt from the FLSA's minimum wage and overtime requirements. Wage & Hour Opinion Letter, 2006 DOL-WH LEXIS 46, September 21, 2006.

Copyright 2007 M. Lee Smith Publishers LLC. LOUISIANA EMPLOYMENT LAW LETTER. LOUISIANA EMPLOYMENT LAW LETTER does not attempt to offer solutions to individual problems but rather to provide information about current developments in Louisiana employment law. Questions about individual problems should be addressed to the employment law attorney of your choice. The State Bar of Louisiana does not designate attorneys as board certified in labor law.

Subscribers Area Resources
(available to Employment Law Letter subscribers)
Log in here for access.

Available to Employment Law Letter subscribers

Other Resources

Not an Employment Law Letter subscriber? Here's more info about your state's Employment Law Letter and the HRhero.com benefits that accompany it.



This Week on HRhero.com

 

HR Q&A

Confusion over benefits for same-sex couples
From Arkansas Employment Law Letter

Q: I'm an HR manager in a midsize company. Recently, one of my employees went on vacation to another state, and while there, she got "married" to her lesbian partner. Now she's claiming that because they're legally married, we have to provide the same insurance and other benefits for her partner that we do for the spouses of heterosexual couples.

We have never discriminated against gay couples, but I'm worried about the message that providing those benefits might send to our other employees. Is she right that she's entitled to the same benefits as other married employees?
Read on

Employers Forum

ADA
We are preparing to terminate an employee due to poor job performance. He has been written up and warned twice about his poor performance. He has made a statement in the past that he has been depressed and is going to see a doctor about it. We feel that he will object to his termination, saying it was his depression that caused his poor performance.

What do we need to be prepared to do?

JudyBeach , TN

Visit Employers Forum to join other discussions or post a question of your own.

How do I join Employers Forum discussions?

HRhero.com Subscribers Area Resources

Get specific ... state-specific, that is. About 75% of HR Hero Line subscribers also subscribe to our state-specific Employment Law Letters. Sign up for your state's Employment Law Letter to get monthly, state-specific updates and access to the HRhero.com Subscribers Area.

HR Tip of the Week

How to avoid liability for third-party harassment
From Indiana Employment Law Letter

Most people are familiar with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its prohibition on sexual harassment that creates a hostile work environment. Several courts have also found that federal law prohibits workplace harassment based on race, religion, disability, and age.

Although many of you are aware that you can be held liable for a supervisor's or even a coworker's harassment of an employee, you may not realize that under certain circumstances, you also can be held liable for a third party's harassment of an employee.

That potential liability can create a trap for the unwary. Some recent federal court decisions provide helpful guidance on when employers may be liable for the harassing actions of third parties like independent contractors or customers.

Read on (Subscribers only)

Tool: HR Sample Policies and Procedures

M. Lee Smith Publishers LLC has teamed up with Margaret Morford, an attorney and President of the national consulting firm theHRedge., Inc. to design a top-notch Policy and Procedure Manual for our Employment Law Letter subscribers.

We created this manual to be more than just a template of policies. It contains commentary on what you should consider including in your policies as well as practical advice and suggestions. Each policy is available in RTF format so you can save and edit the policy on your computer.

How to access:

1. Log into HRhero.com Subscribers Area: www.HRhero.com/lc

2. In middle column, under HR Tools, click "Sample Policies & Procedures"

Need help logging in?