|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
![]()
|
Layoffs have many downsides. Employee morale is guaranteed to drop. A company's unemployment insurance premiums will rise, perhaps steeply. And if an employer provides severance packages and/or outplacement services, they could get very expensive. If layoffs are significant in number, a business may not be able to adequately compete once the economy turns around. And there's always the possibility that a laid-off employee will reintroduce himself to your company by means of a lawsuit. In February, more than 200,000 California state employees were ordered to stay away from work in the first wave of mandatory employee furloughs designed to chip away at a $42 billion budget deficit. At the same time, Wynn Resorts Ltd. reported its intention to cut pay for its salaried workers and reduce hours for hourly employees in an effort to help save $75 million to $100 million annually at its two Las Vegas hotels. The University of Southern Utah hopes to save $5.65 million and avoid widespread layoffs by furloughing 2,995 full- and part-time employees for one week in April. With today's bleak economic outlook, many employers are looking for ways to cut costs without resorting to employee layoffs. If that describes you, then you may want to consider what some states and one of the best-known casino operators are doing. Employee furloughs and reduced-hour schedules are options you may want to consider. But do so carefully. HR Guide to Employment Law: A practical compliance reference manual covering 14 topics, including overtime and other wage and hour issues Furloughs Reduced-hour schedules Audio Conference: Hold Off on Layoffs: Furloughs, Salary Freezes, and Other Labor Cost Cutters Be careful with exempt employees But the requirement of no work is particularly important if a company employs exempt workers. As you know, exempt employees are entitled to full pay for any workweek in which they perform any work. If an employer fails to pay an exempt employee his full salary for any week in which he performs any work, it jeopardizes his (and quite possibly the entire classification's) exempt status. So how can an employer use furloughs or reduced-hour schedules for exempt employees? First and foremost, if you elect to use furloughs for exempt employees, you must furlough the employee for an entire workweek so you don't affect his exempt status. But that may be uninviting if losing exempt employees for an entire week has more downsides than benefits. May you reduce an exempt employee's normal workweek from a five-day, 40-hour workweek to a four-day, 32-hour workweek with a proportionate reduction in salary? Such reductions are permitted only if:
The $455 minimum weekly salary requirement may not be pro-rated to a lesser amount to reflect the shortened workweek. In other words, to preserve exempt status, the weekly salary must be at least $455 regardless of the number of workdays in the workweek. Wage and Hour Compliance Manual Use of accrued leave Remember, in some states, there's no statutory requirement to pay accumulated leave (vacation or paid time off) at the termination of employment. But some employers are bound by collective bargaining agreements or policies requiring the payment of accumulated leave at termination. Whatever decision an employer makes should be influenced by its obligation to pay accumulated leave at termination. State-by-state comparison of 50 employment laws in all 50 states, including leave laws Speaking of collective bargaining agreements . . . Either way, it's always a good practice to at least involve labor union leadership in discussions leading up to furloughs or reduced-hour schedules. Seeking cooperation in advance can mitigate potential problems after implementation. Things will get better Keep up with the latest news in HR and state and federal employment law with HRHero on Return to HR Hero Line e-zine for more tips and articles Copyright 2009 M. Lee Smith Publishers LLC. NEVADA EMPLOYMENTLAW LETTER . The contents of NEVADA EMPLOYMENT LAW LETTER are intended for general information and should not be construed as legal advice or opinion. To request further information or to comment on an article, please contact Michael Gebhart at 775-327-3000 or Anthony L. Hall at 702-669-4600.
: |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||