|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
![]()
|
Summer will soon be here, which means that student interns are arriving at companies for their summer internships -- and many of those positions are unpaid. Internships afford students the opportunity to gain practical, real-world experience as well as explore various career paths and develop potential contacts. Employers should be careful, however. There are legal issues surrounding the use of interns. For example, does an unpaid student internship violate the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal wage and hour law? If your company is considering using interns, you need to make sure you don't run afoul of the FLSA. Learn more about wage laws and correclty classifying interns and trainees in the Wage and Hour Compliance Manual DOL's six-factor test for interns and trainees Whether student interns are considered employees under the FLSA depends on the circumstances surrounding their duties and activities. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) uses a six-part test to determine who can legally be considered an intern or "trainee." All of the following criteria must be met, according to the DOL, for someone to be considered a bona fide intern rather than an employee subject to the FLSA:
State-by-state comparison of 50 employment laws in all 50 states, including minimum wage laws Who benefits: intern or company? In one case involving a company's use of trainees, McLaughlin v. Ensley, the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held that the owner of a snack foods distribution business had to pay trainees for route jobs. Before being formally hired for a route job, the trainees were required to participate in what was usually five days of exposure to the tasks they would be expected to perform. The trainees traveled an ordinary route with an experienced route man. They loaded and unloaded the delivery truck, restocked stores with the employer's product, were given instruction on how to drive the trucks, were introduced to retailers, were taught basic snack food vending machine maintenance, and occasionally helped in preparing orders of goods and with financial exchanges. However, the employer didn't pay any form of compensation to the potential route men during their training week. In determining whether that practice was illegal, the Fourth Circuit explained that the proper inquiry was whether the employer or the trainees principally benefited from the weeklong orientation arrangement. The court found it was evident that the employer received more advantage than the trainees because the trainees were in fact helping the employer distribute snack foods. The skills learned on the job were either so specific to the job or so general to be of practically no transferable usefulness. As a result, the appeals court ruled that the trainees who participated in the orientation program were entitled to receive minimum wages for their work. Ensuring FLSA compliance Also, if a business chooses to use unpaid interns, it should document the nature of the relationship. The documentation should explain that both parties intend the relationship to be an unpaid internship and that the arrangement is intended to provide the intern with a practical learning experience. Importantly, the intern's actual duties should comply with the terms set forth in the employer's written documentation. Audio Conference: Avoid 2009 Wage & Hour Traps: New FLSA Compliance Strategies Bottom line Return to HR Hero Line e-zine for more tips and articles Copyright 2009 M. Lee Smith Publishers LLC. VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT LAW LETTER .
VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT LAW LETTER is a monthly publication provided as an educational service only to assist lay persons in recognizing potential problems in their labor and employment matters. It is not meant to be construed as legal advice. Readers in need of legal assistance should retain the services of competent counsel.
: |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||