Age Discrimination in the Workplace
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits discriminating against workers 40 years old and older because of their age. Many states also have laws prohibiting age discrimination in the workplace. The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) of 1990 amended the ADEA to specifically prohibit employers from discriminating against older worker by denying them benefits.
State by state comparision of 50 employment laws in 50 states, including age discrimination
Related articles on Age Discrimination in the Workplace
Age Discrimination tools for Employment Law Letter subscribers
Layoffs and workers 40 years old and older
It's important for employers to plan carefully when conducting layoffs that involves older workers. Because of the requirements of laws affecting older workers, it's best for companies to consult their attorney to help meet all the legal requirements and to avoid age discrimination charges.
Free HR Hero White Paper: Downsizing: Getting It Right from Termination to Engaging the Survivors
What is age harassment?
Age, like other protected class for workers, also can be the basis of a harassment claim. Although the U.S. Supreme Court hasn't ruled yet whether an employee can sue for age harassment under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, federal appellate and trial courts have found that a claim for age harassment does exist.
What that means for employers is that regardless of what state they do business in, they should act as though age harassment is a protected class and admonish their employees not to engage in such behavior.
Age harassment claims tend to arise because of an employer’s age-biased comments – or tolerance for coworker comments. The employee then points to the the comments as proof that her age was the motivation for an adverse job action. Even if the employee doesn't allege age harassment, she can use that evidence to strengthen her case that the company was biased on the basis of age.
There are some explicit defenses and exceptions in the ADEA defining when an employer may adversely affect the employment of a person age 40 or older. In general, employers may make employment decisions that adversely affect a worker ’s employment status and pay and benefits if its motivation is a “reasonable factor other than age” or falls into one of the narrowly defined exceptions.
As is the case with all forms of discrimination, retaliating against an employee who files an age discrimination charge is unlawful under the ADEA. After an employee has filed a charge or complaint against his employer, whether internally or with an outside agency -- such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) -- or court, the employer should refrain from taking any action against the employee that might be construed as retaliation.
HR Guide to Employment Law: A practical compliance reference manual covering 14 topics, including discrimination
Succession planning
The number of older workers is on the rise and only looking to increase in the years ahead as the baby boomers enter their golden years. That's putting many employers in a tricky situation of having to do succession planning while avoiding comments and actions that might be construed as age discrimination or harassment. It's not an impossible task, but it must be done carefully.
Audio Conference: 60 is the New 40: Overcoming Legal and Talent Management Challenges As Boomers Stay
View all HR topics
Related articles on Age Discrimination in the Workplace featured in HR Hero Line
- 11 Ways to for Supervisors to Avoid Workplace Lawsuits
(South Carolina Employment Law Letter, January 2010)
- EEOC Discrimination Charges Set Records in 2009
(Human Resources News, January 2010)
- Tips for Minimizing Risk When Cutting Labor Costs
(Colorado Employment Law Letter, December 2009)
- EEOC Guidance on Waivers in Severance Agreements
(Indiana Employment Law Letter, October 2009)
- Age Discrimination Filings Jump During Recession
(Diversity Insight, August 2009)
- Supreme Court Ruling Makes Proving Age Discrimination More Difficult
(Human Resources News, June 2009)
- Sotomayor’s District Court Decisions on the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
(The Word on Employment Law, June 2009)
- Important Labor and Employment Decisions before Supreme Court
(Federal Employment Law Insider, January 2009)
- Changes in Employment Law and the Workplace under Obama and New Congress
(Alabama Employment Law Letter, January 2009)
- Sour Economy, Political Changes Could Create Perfect Storm for Employment-Related Lawsuits
(Kansas Employment Law Letter, January 2009)
- Laid-Off Workers Win Some Discrimination Lawsuits, Lose Some
(Utah Employment Law Letter, December 2008)
- Is Breaking the Law Protected Activity by Employees When Filing an EEOC Charge?
(Colorado Employment Law Letter, November 2008)
- Avoiding Legal Pitfalls During RIFs and When Reducing Workers' Hours
(Missouri Employment Law Letter , October 2008)
- Words that Might Sound Like Age Discrimination
(Arizona Employment Law Letter, September 2008)
- How to Say Goodbye to an Employee
(West Virginia Employment Law Letter, March 2008)
- Addressing the Needs of an Aging Workforce
(Georgia Employment Law Letter, January 2008)
- Lordy, Lordy, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Rurns 40
(Kansas Employment Law Letter, December 2007)
- Tips for Employers on Successfully Navigating Layoffs
(Louisiana Employment Law Letter, September 2006)
HR Tools for Age Discrimination
|