HR Hero Your Employment Law Resource

HR Hot Topics

Home > HR Topics > Age Discrimination | All Topics > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Age Discrimination


Additional HR Resources

Managing an Aging Workforce
Compliance dos and don'ts with the with the ADEA and other requirements/issues

Recognizing Discrimination
How to spot and fix problems that could lead to discrimination suits

Baby Boomer Discrimination
Learn exactly which actions invite age discrimination claims

Employment Law in Your State
The scoop on recent state legislation on discrimination and pending decisions

Managing Workers of All Ages
Help your supervisors engage your multi-generational workforce

Help for HR
The tools for avoiding litigation and managing your daily HR workload

Federal Laws and Regulations
Advanced warning of upcoming federal regulations and legislation

Legal Obligations in Every State
The 50 most important employment laws in each of the 50 states

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits discriminating against workers 40 years old and older because of their age. Many states also have laws prohibiting age discrimination in the workplace. The Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1990 amended the ADEA to specifically prohibit employers from discriminating against older worker by denying them benefits.


Related articles on Age Discrimination
Age Discrimination tools for Employment Law Letter subscribers


Age, like other protected worker classifications, also can be the basis of a harassment claim. Although the U.S. Supreme Court hasn't ruled yet whether an employee can sue for age harassment under the ADEA, federal appellate and trial courts have found that a claim for age harassment does exist.

What that means for employers is that regardless of what state they do business in, they should act as though age harassment is a protected classification and admonish their employees not to engage in such behavior.

What is age discrimination and harassment?

Age harassment claims tend to arise because of an employer’s age-biased comments – or tolerance for coworker comments. The comments then are offered as proof that a worker's age was the motivation for an adverse job action. Even if she doesn't allege age harassment, she can use that evidence to strengthen her case that the company was biased on the basis of age.

There are some explicit defenses and exceptions in the ADEA defining when an employer may adversely affect the employment of a person age 40 or older. In general, employers may make employment decisions that adversely affect a person’s employment status and pay and benefits if its motivation is a “reasonable factor other than age” or falls into one of the narrowly defined exceptions.

As is the case with all forms of discrimination, retaliating against an employee who files an age discrimination charge is unlawful under the ADEA. After an employee has filed a charge or complaint, whether internally or with an outside agency or court, you should refrain from taking any action against the employee that might be construed as retaliation.

Succession planning

The number of older workers is on the rise and only looking to increase in the years ahead as the baby boomers enter their golden years. That's putting many employers in a tricky situation of having to do succession planning while avoiding comments and actions that might be construed as age discrimination or harassment. It's not an impossible task, but it must be done carefully.

Reductions in force

It's important to plan carefully when conducting a reduction in force that involves older workers. Because of the requirements of laws affecting older workers, it's best to consult your attorney to help you meet all the legal requirements and to avoid age discrimination charges.

View all HR topics

Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Related articles on Age Discrimination from the State Employment Law Letters
designates additional valuable resources available exclusively to Employment Law Letter subscribers

Lockheed Martin to pay $773,000 for firing eight employees because of age
  Maryland Employment Law Letter, May 2008
Reverse age discrimination: Can you discriminate against younger employees?
  Virginia Employment Law Letter, March 2008
Supreme Court weighs in (sort of) on 'me, too' evidence
  The Tennessee Employment LawLetter, March 2008
A little bit country, and a little bit way too old
  California Employment Law Letter,January 14, 2008
Splitting 'Hares' between succession planning and age discrimination
  Utah Employment LawLetter, January 2008
Lordy, lordy, the ADEA turns 40
  Kansas Employment Law Letter, November 2007
'Young, energetic' comments fail to support age-bias claim
  Iowa Employment Law Letter,November 2007
Train dispatcher's claims derailed
  Arkansas Employment Law Letter, October 2007
What does 'sufficiently younger' mean?
  Pennsylvania Employment Law Letter, September2007

HR Tools for Age Discrimination

     
Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Subscriber Login