HR Hero Your Employment Law Resource

HR Hot Topics

Home > HR Topics > Drug-Free Workplace Act | All Topics > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Drug-Free Workplace Act


Additional HR Resources

Federal Guidance
Advanced warning of upcoming federal regulations and legislation

Substance Abuse at Work
How to implement drug testing and other prevention and response solutions

Privacy Issues
When drug testing and other policies run afoul of privacy laws

Smoker Testing
The limits of smoking bans and testing for nicotine and other substances

Testing and the Hiring Process
When you can drug test and other allowable exams

Self-Auditing Your Policies
How to spot and fix policy problems, including testing protocols

The federal Drug-Free Workplace Act can refer to either of two acts that were passed in 1988 and 1992, respectively. Both Drug-Free Workplace Acts apply to employers seeking federal contracts of $25,000 or more as well as federal grantees. These employers must certify that they will provide a drug-free workplace. The law doesn't require alcohol or drug testing, but testing is implicitly authorized as a means to maintain a drug-free workplace.


Related articles on the Drug-Free Workplace Act
Drug-Free Workplace Act tools for Employment Law Letter subscribers


They are essentially the same, but the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1992 requires further steps to creating a drug-free workplace to include drug testing of all employees in sensitive positions and provisions for anti-drug education and training.

Employers whose companies fall under this category must have a policy prohibiting the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance in the workplace and specifying what actions will be taken in the event of violations.

If an employee is convicted of a drug crime that occurred in your workplace, you must take certain actions against the employee and notify the contracting or granting government agency. Failure to comply with these provisions or any of the Act’s other requirements can result in serious consequences. If a contractor violates the above-stated requirements, its contract may be suspended or even terminated.

Additionally, if enough of a contractor's employees have been convicted of criminal drug offenses for conduct occurring in the workplace, a federal agency can conclude that the contractor has failed to make a good-faith effort to provide a drug-free workplace and the same serious consequences of contract suspension or termination may follow.

View all HR topics

Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Related articles on the Drug-Free Workplace Act from the State Employment Law Letters
designates additional valuable resources available exclusively to Employment Law Letter subscribers

Did your employee inhale?
  Alabama Employment Law Letter, March 2008
Employee's prescription up in smoke ― a bummer for pot patients in California
  California Employment Law Letter, February 11, 2008
To test or not to test? That is the question
  New Mexico Employment Law Letter, December2007
Implementing a drug- and alcohol-testing policy
  Indiana Employment Law Letter, September2007
Benefits, potential liability of drug screens and personality tests
  New York Employment LawLetter, August 2006

HR Tools for the Drug-Free Workplace Act

     

Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Subscriber Login


Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.