HR Hero Your Employment Law Resource

HR Hot Topics

Home > HR Topics > Drug Testing | All Topics > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Drug Testing


Additional HR Resources

Substance Abuse at Work
How to implement drug testing and other prevention and response solutions

Privacy Issues
When drug testing and other policies run afoul of privacy laws

State Requirements
State-specific requirements for drug testing and other policies

Smoker Testing
The legal limits of smoking bans, nicotine testing and other health issues

Testing and the Hiring Process
When you can drug test and other allowable exams

According to a report released by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 8.2 percent — about one in 12 — full-time workers ages 18 to 64 used illegal drugs in the past month.

Most of the illicit drug use involved marijuana (6.4%). The highest rates of illegal drug users were among food service workers (17.4%) and construction workers (15.1%). Those in educational services and utilities had the lowest rates of about four percent.


Related articles on Drug Testing
Drug Testing tools for Employment Law Letter subscribers
What's your HR IQ on Researching Job Applicants?


The study, from the 2002, 2003, and 2004 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health, uncovers an important finding for business owners, showing that current drug users were more likely to work for employers that did not conduct drug or alcohol testing programs. In addition, nearly a third of current illicit drug users said they would be less likely to work for employers that conducted random drug testing.

Because drug use can affect your employees' health and productivity, it's important to periodically review your drug-testing policies. By implementing workplace drug-testing policies, you may be able to help prevent drug use before it starts, identify employees who need drug treatment, and reduce work-related accidents due to illegal drug use. One of the biggest issues employer face when dealing with drug testing is invasion into employee privacy.

In the late 1980s, the U.S. Supreme Court approved employer testing of job applicants and employees for drugs and alcohol in special circumstances. Also, federal legislation, most notably the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1988, requires most federal contractors and grantees to create policies designed to maintain a drug-free workplace. A later law mandated testing regulations for the transportation industry.

Several federal agencies have implemented testing requirements. For example, the U.S. Department of Defense tests all security-sensitive employees, while the U.S. Department of Transportation requires the same for a wide range of employees such as truck drivers, airline crews, train crews, and pipeline employees in safety-sensitive jobs.

Many states have enacted their own statutes, including testing standards, designed to ensure drug-free and alcohol-free workplaces in both the private and public sectors. Testing also is widespread in the remaining states, especially among larger employers.

Comprehensive laws and regulations on alcohol and drug testing cover many issues. These include an employers’ right to test, the creation and communication of policies, the collection and custody of samples, laboratory licensing and procedures, the consequences of positive results, confidentiality of results, and the enforcement of rights and obligations.

View all HR topics

Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Related articles on Drug Testing from the State Employment Law Letters
designates additional valuable resources available exclusively to Employment Law Letter subscribers

Medical marijuana patients score legislative victory
  California Employment Law Letter, April 25, 2008
Did your employee inhale?
  Alabama Employment Law Letter, March 2008
Employee's prescription up in smoke ― a bummer for pot patients in California
  California Employment Law Letter, February 11, 2008
Postinjury drug test demanded two months later isn't unlawful
  Minnesota Employment LawLetter, February 2008
When smoke gets in your eyes
  California Employment Law Letter, December 10, 2007
To test or not to test? That is the question
  New Mexico Employment Law Letter, December2007
DOT drug testing 'ineffective'?
  Iowa Employment Law Letter, December 2007
Managing your drug-testing policies
  The Tennessee Employment Law Letter, October 2007
Implementing a drug- and alcohol-testing policy
  Indiana Employment Law Letter, September2007
It must have been the painkillers: a sordid tale of drug testing and defamation
  DelawareEmployment Law Letter, July 2007

HR Tools for Drug Testing

     

Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Subscriber Login