HR Hero Your Employment Law Resource

HR Hot Topics

Home > HR Topics > EEOC | All Topics > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)


Additional HR Resources

EEOC Guidance on Caregivers
Learn the risks for discrimination for working parents and caregivers

The Intellectually Disabled
Compassionate solutions to challenges while maintaining productivity

An Aging Workforce
Stay off the EEOC's hit list by learning how to avoid age discrimination

Recognizing Discrimination
How to spot and respond to workplace discrimination

Avoiding Harassment Claims
How to Avoid religious harassment and discrimination claims

Religion at Work
How NOT to join the long line of religious discrimination claims

Employment Law in Your State
State-specific EEOC cases and other legislative action

Federal Employment Law
Advanced warning on upcoming federal regulations and legislation

The EEOC enforces Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

The commission processes allegations of discrimination based on race, color, sex, national origin, disability, age, and religion. It also handles retaliation charges based on an employee's or former employee's participation in some type of protected conduct (usually opposing perceived discriminatory practices or filing a discrimination charge).


Related articles on the EEOC
EEOC tools for Employment Law Letter subscribers
What's your HR IQ on National Origin Discrimination?


In 2006, nearly 76,000 charges were filed with the EEOC. The most common charges involved race (35.9%), sex (30.7%), retaliation (29.8%), age (21.8%), and disability (20.6%).

What happens when an employee files a charge with the EEOC?

Many employers mistakenly assume there's a screening process at the EEOC — that if a charge is completely baseless the commission will refuse to accept and investigate it. Unfortunately, that's not the case. By law, the EEOC must accept the filing of a charge, and employees have the unfettered right to file charges no matter how weak the claim.

Once a charge is filed, the EEOC will begin its investigation, and the burden shifts to the employer to explain what happened. Soon after the charge is filed, the employer will receive notice from the EEOC, a copy of the charge, and instructions on what its responsibilities are — usually a demand for information, documents, and/or a position statement.

Once the EEOC concludes its investigation and issues a ruling, the employee receives a right-to-sue letter. The employee then has 90 days from receipt of the right-to-sue letter to file a lawsuit.

On some occasions, employees receive their right-to-sue letter even before the EEOC completes its investigation. That usually occurs if the EEOC determines that it will be unable to conclude its investigation for some prolonged period and the employee requests a right-to-sue notice.

An employee's ability to file a lawsuit isn't dependent on whether the EEOC rules in favor of the employer or the employee. Consequently, an employer shouldn’t get too excited if the EEOC finds in its favor — an employee still has the ability to file a lawsuit regardless of an EEOC "no cause" finding.

Many employers ask: "What's the point in investing time and money to carefully respond to an EEOC charge?" While that question is certainly understandable, it's important to remember that a "no cause" finding has some important practical ramifications that can benefit an employer.

View all HR topics


Related articles on the EEOC from the State Employment Law Letters
designates additional valuable resources available exclusively to Employment Law Letter subscribers

New EEOC guidance relating to veterans with disabilities
  New Hampshire Employment Law Letter, May 2008
Do not pass 'Go,' do not collect $200: Arrest records can land you in EEOC jail
  Delaware Employment Law Letter, April 2008
Discriminatory employment tests score an 'F' with the EEOC
  Indiana Employment Law Letter, April 2008
Lockheed Martin pays whopping $2.5 million to settle race claims
  Florida Employment Law Letter, February 2008
Behind the scenes at the EEOC
  Washington Employment Law Letter, February 2008
Passing the test: EEOC's new guidance on employment tests, selection procedures
  New YorkEmployment Law Letter, February 2008
How ― and why ― to respond to an EEOC charge
  Texas Employment Law Letter,February 2008
Tips for producing an effective EEOC position statement
  Arizona Employment Law Letter,January 2008
Investigating the investigator
  Nevada Employment Law Letter, October 2007
Update on EEOC's litigation plans and strategies
  Federal Employment Law Insider, June2007
The EEOC, the ADA, and health care jobs
  South Carolina Employment Law Letter, May 2007
A new direction for the EEOC?
  Georgia Employment Law Letter, April 2007
Participation clause protects only participation during EEOC investigations
  GeorgiaEmployment Law Letter, March 2007
EEOC guidance on workplace investigations
  New York Employment Law Letter, February2007

HR Tools for the EEOC

     

Subscriber Login