HR Hero Your Employment Law Resource

HR Hot Topics

Home > HR Topics > Immigration | All Topics > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Immigration


Additional HR Resources

Immigration Enforcement
An intensive review of U.S. Department of Homeland Security's policy and more

New Enforcement Tactics
An audio conference on the status of "no match" letters and new legal risks

E-Verify Pros and Cons
The potential dangers, safeguards and solutions for using the E-Verify program

Immigration Law Update
Get current developments at
premier employment law seminar

Immigration Compliance
Audio conference CD guides you
through I-9s & documentation

Immigration News
Newsletter alerts readers of
changes in immigration laws

Discover policy pitfalls
Audit your workplace policies
before a plaintiff’s attorney does

There are a lot of new developments in the world of immigration and undocumented workers. Let's take a look at some of the bigger issues.


Related articles on Immigration
Immigration tools for Employment Law Letter subscribers
HRhero.com immigration survey results (subscribers only)
Bush requires federal contractors to use E-Verify


New I-9 form released

For the first time since 1991, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued a revised Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, for immediate use and a new M-274, Handbook for Employers, Instructions for Completing the Form I-9.

All employers are required to complete a Form I-9 for each employee hired in the United States. The USCIS has encouraged employers to start using the new form as soon as possible. Employers that fail to use the new form after the effective date, December 26, 2007, are subject to fines and penalties.

A copy of the new Form I-9 can be found at www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-9.pdf. You can find the new handbook at www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/m-274.pdf.

The Department of Homeland Security's "No-Match Rules"

In August of 2007, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a series of regulations and procedures called the "No-Match Rules" for employers that receive employee no-match letters from the Social Security Administration. The No-Match Rules would have forced employers receiving such letters to resolve the legal status of the workers in question within 90 days. Shortly after though, a federal judge imposed a temporary injunction blocking the enforcment of the new rules, but agreed to delay a final decision on whether to make the injunction permanent. In response, the DHS issued a supplement in late March 2008 which addresses the grounds cited for the temporary injunction. Only time will tell, however, whether the new proposals will completely satisfy the court's issues with the No-Match Rules.

SSA considers cutting red tape of E-Verify system

While employers wait for the outcome of the DHS' appeal of the "no-match" rules, the Social Security Administration (SSA) is considering cutting some of the red tape of the E-Verify system. Currently, employers that receive no-match letters must make a trip to their local SSA office to try to verify a worker's employment status. According to a report that evaluates the E-Verify system, the SSA is considering no longer requiring employees whose information doesn't match up to make a trip to their local SSA office.

Immigration history in the United States

The United States has had a number of different approaches to immigration. Initially, immigration was unlimited and encouraged. Congress later moved to quotas focusing on national or ethnic groups.

During the 1940s and 1950s, Congress struggled with the "Bracero Program," which authorized contractors, sometimes called "farm bosses," to contract with foreign nationals to do agricultural work (usually hand-harvested crops), and the nationals were then deported at the end of the season.

Finally, in 1952, Congress passed the Immigration and Nationality Act, which established the present structures, and in 1965, it replaced ethnic and national quotas with quotas based on perceived employer needs and job vacancies.

In 1960, there were fewer than a million undocumented immigrants, but most experts now estimate there are least 10 to 12 million, and immigrants now make up at least 15 percent of the labor force. Latinos alone account for almost 37 percent of 2006 U.S. employment growth and fill approximately two out of three new jobs in the construction industry, according to the Pew Hispanic Center.

Another landmark piece of immigration legislation, called the Immigration Reform and Control Act, was voted into existence under the Reagan administration in 1984. It is the most recent far-sweeping legislative action on the issue of immigration to date.

No one defends the current system, which by all accounts is broken. Nevertheless, there is no clear consensus on a fix. Indeed, there is no accepted mechanism for determining job "needs" or measuring the effects of immigration levels on domestic job rates.

View all HR topics

Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Related articles on Immigration from the State Employment Law Letters
designates additional valuable resources available exclusively to Employment Law Letter subscribers

OPT extension proposed for highly skilled foreign students
  Michigan Employment Law Letter, July 2008
Aliens, immigration, and employment ― South Carolina-style
  South Carolina Employment Law Letter, July 2008
Changes for the TN nonimmigrant classification
  Michigan Employment Law Letter, June2008
Postville immigration raid spurs host of legal claims
  Iowa Employment Law Letter, June 2008
Inflation adjustment on penalties imposed by INA
  New Hampshire Employment Law Letter, May2008
New rule allows science, tech grads extra time for H-1B lottery
  Vermont Employment LawLetter, May 2008
DHS, DOJ raise stakes for employers violating INA
  Federal Employment Law Insider, April2008
LAWA leads to 'Hispanic Panic'
  Arizona Employment Law Letter, March 2008
Penalties increase for certain immigration violations
  Georgia Employment Law Letter, March2008
DHS adopts new Form I-9
  Kentucky Employment Law Letter, January 2008
I-9s: a primer on the new form and a reminder on some old ways
  Oklahoma Employment LawLetter, January 2008
English-only rules ― bueno or not so bueno?
  Nevada Employment Law Letter, January2008
Work site enforcement actions on the rise
  Michigan Employment Law Letter, November2007
Proposal to replace older permanent resident cards unveiled
  Michigan Employment Law Letter,October 2007
Lawsuit halts no-match letters
  Wisconsin Employment Law Letter, October 2007
Passport delays frustrate business travelers
  Michigan Employment Law Letter, September2007
Employers face immigration crackdown
  Federal Employment Law Insider, September 2007
With all H-1B visas gone, consider TN classification
  Michigan Employment Law Letter, June2007
¿Por qué no habla usted inglés? Can you institute an 'English-only' rule?
  IndianaEmployment Law Letter, May 2007

HR Tools for Immigration

     

Bookmark and Share Send to a Colleague

Subscriber Login