HR Hero Your Employment Law Resource

HR Hot Topics

Home > HR Topics > Race Discrimination | All Topics > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Race Discrimination


Additional HR Resources

Racial Hatred at Work
Why symbols of racial hatred are
reemerging and how to respond

Recognizing Discrimination
How to recognize and respond to discrimination in the workplace

Avoid Discrimination Claims
How to keep "It's not fair!" from becoming "It's discrimination!"

Unintentional Discrimination
Protect your organization from unintentional discrimination

Basic Training for Supervisors
How supervisors can address and prevent discrimination at work

Advice for Supervisors
How to avoid workplace discrimination and other legal dos and don'ts

Signs of Harassment
How supervisors spot harassment at work and other legal dangers

Employment Law in Your State
Where your state lawmakers and fellow employers stand on this issue

Federal Employment Law
Advanced warning on upcoming federal regulations and legislation

Charges alleging race discrimination in employment were included in over a third of the charges filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in 2006, making race still the most frequently alleged basis of employment discrimination under federal law.


Related articles on Race Discrimination
Race Discrimination tools for Employment Law Letter subscribers


Discrimination and Title VII

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, generally prohibits the following types of race-based discrimination.

  • Ancestry. For example, discrimination against all persons of Asian ancestry would violate Title VII.
  • Physical characteristics associated with race. For example, discrimination based on an individual's color, hair, facial features, height, or weight could violate Title VII if the characteristic on which the employer is discriminating is associated with a particular race.
  • Race-linked illness. There are certain types of disease or illness that affect primarily persons of particular races. There are other diseases that aren't directly linked to race or ethnicity but have a disproportionately high incidence in certain groups.
  • Culture. Policies that discriminate based on cultural characteristics linked to race or ethnicity, such as a person's name, cultural dress or grooming practices, accent, or manner of speech may be challenged.
  • Perception. Title VII prohibits discrimination against an individual based on the belief or perception that a person is a member of a particular racial group.
  • Association. Title VII also prohibits discrimination based on association with someone of a particular race, such as discrimination against a Caucasian who's married to an African American or has a multiracial or biracial child.
  • Subgroup or race plus another factor. Title VII prohibits conduct such as rejection of African-American women job applicants who have preschool-age children while not rejecting women of other races who have preschool-age children. In this example, the employer isn't discriminating against all African Americans but is discriminating based on race within a certain subgroup of persons within that protected status.
  • Reverse race discrimination. Title VII prohibits race discrimination against all persons, including Caucasians.

Disparate-treatment and disparate-impact claims

There are two basic types of race and color discrimination claims under Title VII. Disparate-treatment discrimination occurs when race, color, or another protected trait is a motivating factor in how an individual is treated.

Disparate-impact discrimination occurs when a neutral policy or practice has a significant negative impact on one or more protected groups and either the policy or practice isn't job-related and consistent with business necessity or there's a less discriminatory alternative and the employer has refused to adopt it.

Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866

There are several gaps in the protective umbrella of Title VII. One of these areas involves the special case of independent contractors. Independent contractors, when correctly categorized as such, are not full employees and therefore not offered the same protections. An employer still can find herself in hot water, however, when her employees harass or discriminate against an independent contractor they work alongside. Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 protects minorities' rights to enter contracts and by extension binds both parties to the contract to perform their end of the bargain without discrimination or harassment.

Affirmative-action plans

Affirmative-action programs may be implemented when, for example, there's a need to eliminate a manifest imbalance in a traditionally segregated job category. Because affirmative-action and diversity programs carry a significant risk of reverse discrimination challenges, you should exercise caution and consider consulting legal counsel before implementing such a program.

View all HR topics


Related articles on Race Discrimination from the State Employment Law Letters
designates additional valuable resources available exclusively to Employment Law Letter subscribers

Lockheed Martin pays whopping $2.5 million to settle race claims
  Florida Employment Law Letter, February 2008
Walgreens must defend claim by black manager passed over to manage 'white' store
  Illinois Employment Law Letter, February 2008
Racial slurs cost half a mil
  Alabama Employment Law Letter, February 2008
Judge says Disney World staffing policies aren't Mickey Mouse
  Minnesota Employment Law Letter, January 2008
Two teachers get schooled: Court gives a lesson in employment law
  Arizona Employment LawLetter, December 2007
Consistently poor evaluations result in dismissal of race, retaliation claims
  WisconsinEmployment Law Letter, October 2007
Race not a factor in dealer's decision not to make 'offensive' job offer
  ArkansasEmployment Law Letter, October 2007
Seventh Circuit runs over Dunkin'
  Illinois Employment Law Letter, September 2007
EEOC's E-RACE initiative targets employment policies that appear neutral
  South CarolinaEmployment Law Letter, June 2007
TOSHA rules, race discrimination, and wage violations
  The Tennessee Employment Law Letter,April 2007
Airport employee's race discrimination case doesn't fly with Fourth Circuit
  South CarolinaEmployment Law Letter, March 2007
Race and weight — what's the connection?
  Pennsylvania Employment Law Letter, February2007

HR Tools for Race Discrimination

     

Subscriber Login