HR Hero Your Employment Law Resource

HR Hot Topics

Home > HR Topics > Safety | All Topics > A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Safety


Additional HR Resources

Discover Policy Pitfalls
Audit your workplace policies
before a plaintiff's attorney does

Train Supervisors DVD
Turnkey training system explains
safety & workers comp

OSHA & Employee Health
Fostering physical, emotional, and psychological health at work

Labor Law Posters
All-inclusive state poster kit
has OSHA if state requires.

Supervisor Training
Booklet series helps managers
deal with workplace safety

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act), companies are required to provide a safe workplace for their employees. Employees who are concerned about an unsafe condition may file a complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which will conduct an investigation and fine a company for any violations it finds.


Related articles on Safety
Safety tools for Employment Law Letter subscribers


The OSH Act and the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) both give employees the right to refuse to work in conditions they believe are unsafe. The employees must have a reasonable, good-faith belief that working would be unsafe, but the law protects them even if they’re honestly mistaken about the danger. The two laws have slightly different standards.

Protected concerted activity

For both union and nonunion employees, refusing to work because of safety concerns can be a concerted activity that’s protected by the NLRA. Concerted activity usually involves more than one employee, but it can consist of one employee acting on a matter that affects other workers.

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) clearly would protect a refusal to work if conditions were actually unsafe or if employees had a “reasonable and honest belief” that the work presented a safety hazard. What if the employees’ concerted action was unreasonable? The NLRB has indicated that it would protect unreasonable actions as well.

Workers' compensation

In general, employees who are injured on the job are entitled to workers’ compensation regardless of whether the injury resulted from an unsafe condition or whether anyone had reported that condition to the employer. If a company allows extremely unsafe conditions that injure or kill an employee, it may lose the protection of workers’ compensation law. Then the employee or her family could sue the company with no limit on damages.

Ergonomics

Ergonomics is the science of designing equipment to maximize worker productivity by reducing operator discomfort and fatigue. The principle behind ergonomics is that by fitting the job to the worker, either by adjusting the workstation, rotating the job between workers, or using mechanical assistance, certain workplace injuries can be greatly reduced or even eliminated.

Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 30 percent of illnesses and injuries with days away from work and employers are paying more than $15 billion a year in workers’ comp costs for those injuries and the costs associated with them.

Workplace violence

Employers may be liable for negligence if they fail to exercise ordinary care to avoid potential violence in the workplace. Violence by employees can create liability for negligent hiring, retention, supervision, or training if their conduct was reasonably foreseeable.

Employers and business property owners also face potential liability for failing to address an increased risk of violence from the outside, such as a threat of nighttime assaults or robberies in a high-crime area. Workers’ compensation laws cover some workplace injuries due to violence, but not all. The rules vary from state to state.

View all HR topics


Related articles on Safety from the State Employment Law Letters
designates additional valuable resources available exclusively to Employment Law Letter subscribers

O-ffices S-hould H-ave A-wareness: OSHA applies to you
  New York Employment Law Letter, April 2008
Oops, I shot an employee! When guns and work collide
  Louisiana Employment Law Letter, February 2008
OSHA announces new pay rule for personal protective equipment
  Oklahoma Employment Law Letter, January 2008
Ergonomic solutions
  Alabama Employment Law Letter, December 2007
Dangerous dust
  Alabama Employment Law Letter, November 2007
OSHA regulation doesn't bar state-law product liability claim
  New Jersey Employment LawLetter, August 2007
Dot your i's, cross your t's: Paperwork violations can mean hefty OSHA fines
  West VirginiaEmployment Law Letter, July 2007
Managing risk at multiemployer work sites
  Alabama Employment Law Letter, July 2007
OSHA proposes revisions to safety equipment standard
  Federal Employment Law Insider, June2007
You'll get more than a 'slap on the wrist' for ignoring OSHA regs
  New York Employment LawLetter, May 2007
Conducting internal health and safety audits
  Oregon Employment Law Letter, March 2007

HR Tools for Safety

     

Subscriber Login